News | June 16, 2026
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
May 8, 2026
Secretariat is pleased to share that 10 of our experts have been recognized in the Lexology Index 2026 Investigations report, produced in partnership with Global Investigations Review. The guide highlights leading investigations lawyers, digital forensic specialists, and forensic accountants who are trusted to support the most demanding matters worldwide.
Secretariat earned strong representation in the Investigations rankings, reflecting both the caliber of our professionals and the continued impact of Secretariat’s highly regarded Investigations & Disputes practice.
Our continued presence in Lexology’s rankings speaks to the firm’s ongoing commitment to delivering rigorous, independent insight in complex and high‑stakes investigations. Clients rely on Secretariat for clarity, credibility, and experience when the outcome matters most, and this recognition reinforces the trust they place in our work.
Explore the Lexology Index 2026 Investigations report to learn more and read what clients and peers have shared about our experts below.
Sean Lim (Singapore) has over a decade of experience in digital investigations. He operates at the epicentre of matters involving regulatory scrutiny, employment disputes, intellectual-property concerns and post-breach analysis, offering sought-after guidance across multinational data environments.
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
What Companies Should Be Watching in Securities Enforcement for the Remainder of 2026
Companies face a shifting securities enforcement landscape in H2 2026, where AI, digital assets, prediction markets, and parallel investigations create new risks even as financial reporting and controls remain core priorities driving more targeted, tech-focused, and multi-agency scrutiny.
Algorithmic Pricing, Antitrust Risk, and the Role of Economic Analysis
Recent DOJ settlements and new California and New York legislation are clarifying antitrust risks around algorithmic pricing. This article examines key enforcement themes, high-risk forms of data sharing and information exchange, and the role of economic analysis in assessing algorithm design, adoption, competitive effects, and compliance risk.