As the world’s economies have grown increasingly interdependent and complex, the number, types, and sheer size of disputes have grown with them. No industry is untouched, and international disputes have burgeoned, filling the dockets of nearly every arbitration forum.
With offices in the world’s key financial and arbitration centers, Secretariat is recognized and respected for our expertise by the legal and business communities. We traditionally rank among the top few firms in Global Arbitration Review’s annual Expert Witness Firms’ Power Index – described as the definitive global ranking of expert firms across the international arbitration industry and our testifying experts represent the second-largest population of Who’s Who Legal (WWL)-rated individuals (24), and second among those ranked as “global elite thought leaders.”
Secretariat’s trusted experts have provided independent and authoritative expert witness testimony in major commercial and investment treaty disputes under the rules of a wide range of arbitral forums. Our testimony is clear, concise, and supported with in-depth research and analysis – and undeniably persuasive. Above all, experience is what makes us different and prepares us to meet every challenge. Our experts’ academic and professional credentials include: CPA, CA, CFA, CFE, CBV, MBA, FCA, and Ph.D., to name a few. Together, our globally integrated teams are experienced in collaborating on matters regardless of where disputes originate or where hearings are conducted.
Among the many types of disputes in which our experts have been privileged to provide their opinions of value, loss, and damage, are:
Secretariat’s dispute resolution services have worldwide credibility. In addition to participating in trials, mediations, and dispute review boards around the world, our professionals regularly provide expert testimony in arbitral forums in many international venues. Our international arbitration experience includes the following, to name a few:
Secretariat Client Natera Wins Preliminary Injunction against NeoGenomics
Economic analysis performed by Dr. Anup Malani and the Secretariat team demonstrates that a preliminary injunction is warranted. Natera, Inc., which specializes in cell-free DNA testing technology, sought a preliminary injunction against competitor NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Recursive Nash-in-Nash Bargaining Solution
Keith Waeher authored the paper “Recursive Nash-in-Nash Bargaining Solution” with Xiaowei Yu. The paper has been published in Economics Bulletin.
The Dawning of Diverse Data: How eDiscovery Is Moving Beyond Emails
Gone are the days when email reigned supreme in eDiscovery. The digital landscape is evolving rapidly and, within the next two years, diverse digital data will surpass email in prevalence. This shift will significantly impact legal reviews, demanding new approaches and adaptations. Let’s explore the rise of diverse data, its implications for eDiscovery, and how […]