Secretariat is a trailblazer in applying contemporary financial theory to a broad spectrum of securities-related issues and financial disputes. We are highly regarded for our use of sophisticated and widely accepted statistical methodologies within financial and securities litigation and for the kind of comprehensive understanding of financial markets required in resolving disputes.
Our team of economists and securities experts regularly provides advisory services, litigation support, and expert testimony in complex securities and financial litigation, presenting clear and understandable analyses of market efficiency, causation, materiality, class certification, and damages. We effectively address intricate matters ranging from securities, structured finance, and derivatives to valuation, contract disputes, and consumer finance. Our evidence-driven, quantitative analysis, characterized by their rigorous methodologies, hold up to even the closest scrutiny.
Our expertise also extends to tax litigation, where we advise clients and provide testimony on matters encompassing economic impacts, economic substance, risk management, transfer pricing, and valuation.
Secretariat has assisted clients in a myriad of business, financial, and securities-related challenges, including the following and more:
The cornerstone of our methodology is ongoing and profound collaboration among experts and with our clients. Experts from various segments of Secretariat’s practice, whose unique knowledge and experience provide both insight and value, team when necessary with highly regarded external experts in various research and analytical disciplines who enhance the service we provide to clients. By fostering an environment of constant and transparent communication, we develop and execute creative and compelling solutions to our clients’ litigation challenges based on a thorough grasp of their business imperatives and objectives.
Secretariat Client Natera Wins Preliminary Injunction against NeoGenomics
Economic analysis performed by Dr. Anup Malani and the Secretariat team demonstrates that a preliminary injunction is warranted. Natera, Inc., which specializes in cell-free DNA testing technology, sought a preliminary injunction against competitor NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
Recursive Nash-in-Nash Bargaining Solution
Keith Waeher authored the paper “Recursive Nash-in-Nash Bargaining Solution” with Xiaowei Yu. The paper has been published in Economics Bulletin.
The Dawning of Diverse Data: How eDiscovery Is Moving Beyond Emails
Gone are the days when email reigned supreme in eDiscovery. The digital landscape is evolving rapidly and, within the next two years, diverse digital data will surpass email in prevalence. This shift will significantly impact legal reviews, demanding new approaches and adaptations. Let’s explore the rise of diverse data, its implications for eDiscovery, and how […]