May 16, 2018
Intensity joined Secretariat on February 1, 2023.
Originally published in Law360. With its April 25, 2014, opinion in Apple Inc. v. Motorola Inc., the Federal Circuit has provided new material for defenders of Daubert challenges, and may have initiated a reverse in the trend of challenging expert testimony. While past opinions from the Federal Circuit have been helpful to understand what is unacceptable in calculating patent damages, the opinion in Apple v. Motorola offers relatively broad guidance on what is acceptable in calculating damages.
Secretariat Experts Lead the Field in Lexology’s 2025 Thought Leaders – Arbitration Report
Secretariat has earned the top position in the Lexology Index Thought Leaders – Arbitration 2025 report, with the most experts listed in the rankings, and highest number of Global Elite Thought Leaders. The Lexology Index Thought Leaders – Arbitration report is a highly respected publication that spotlights the world’s foremost arbitrators, legal counsel, and […]
Expert Economic Testimony Plays Crucial Role in Puerto Rico Healthcare Antitrust Case
Director Jason Albert provided pivotal testimony in Roberto Vázquez-Ramos, et al. v. Triple-S Salud, et al., which examined allegations of unfair competition and monopolistic practices involving exclusive provider arrangements under Puerto Rico’s government health plan. In May 2019, the Plaintiffs—a group of urologists in Puerto Rico’s Western Region—alleged that Triple-S Salud (“Triple-S”), the region’s government […]
Navigating ECCTA: A Guide for Organizations
Ben Boorer, writing for Enterprise Times, discusses the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA), which comes into force on 1st September 2025. ECCTA will reshape the UK’s compliance landscape by, amongst other things, holding organisations accountable for fraud committed by employees, agents, and subsidiaries.