Trademarks

Expertise to Assist Clients in Resolving Lanham Act and Other Trademark Disputes

Trademarks are often an essential component of a company’s business model and plan. Trademarks, a form of intellectual property, are symbols, logos, words, or designs that assign unique identifiers to goods or services so consumers can identify a particular company’s offerings and distinguish them from competing offerings. Various remedies are available in trademark litigation, including actual damages, the defendant’s profits, statutory damages, reasonable royalty damages, and injunctive relief. Our economic, finance, accounting, and statistical experts provide robust research, analysis, and expertise to assist clients in resolving Lanham Act and other trademark disputes involving claims for monetary recovery or injunctive relief.

Determining and quantifying an appropriate remedy or remedies in trademark litigation can involve challenging economic issues including an analysis of causation (i.e., a nexus, or economic link, between the alleged conduct and economic performance), evaluation of factors that affect financial outcomes and that are unrelated to the alleged conduct, determination of the length of the loss period, identification and measurement of offsets to claimed damages, and assessment of possible future damages. Resolving these issues may involve addressing the competitive relationship, or lack thereof, between the relevant products or companies and evaluating the impact of alleged conduct on consumer impressions.

Our analyses of trademark issues are not cookie-cutter; instead, we tailor our approaches to the specific issues of each case, letting relevant facts and robust analytical principles guide our work. Because no two trademark cases are the same, we perform statistical analyses and utilize forensic accounting techniques as appropriate to generate damages models to align with case-specific issues. Our experts routinely provide analysis, opinions, and testimony in trademark disputes for both plaintiffs and defendants. Our team’s combined experience spans a spectrum of issues and industries, including advertising, computers and computer software, healthcare, apparel, medical devices, pharmaceutical, engineering, construction, retail, toys, beauty products, luxury goods, spirits, and beverages.

Key Experts

Bruce Blacker

Managing Director

+1 469 257 5585

Focus Areas

Lost Profits

Lost profits are often described as the difference between a patentholder’s actual profits and the profits that would have been earned but for patent infringment. Accordingly, infringement that impacts prices, sales quantities, or costs of the patentholder may result in lost profits.

Engagement Examples

  • Developed reliable econometric models of product sales to estimate the sales revenue that would have occurred but for patent infringement. The econometric models included multi-variate regressions that were calibrated during a time period without infringement and then applied during the period of infringement, thereby isolating the effects of the infringement separate and apart from other factors that impacted product sales.
  • Defined the relevant market for products accused of infringement along with a quantitative determination of market shares among suppliers, which was used in a Mor-Flo market-share approach that was specifically tailored to the factual circumstances of the products, suppliers, and customers.
  • In an industry characterized by few sales transactions that are each unique for the purchase of large equipment, we performed analysis of the economic factors driving the purchase of each individual transaction. Analysis of manufacturing and sales capacity, along with product differentiation, directly impacted the calculation of lost profits.
  • In connection with the Panduit factors, evaluated the economic viability of non-infringing alternatives, substitution patterns across products, pricing dynamics, and the evolution of product availability across time to quantify product sales that would have occurred but for infringement.
Unjust Enrichment

Upon a finding of misuse of certain types of intellectual property (i.e., trade secret misappropriation, copyright infringement, and trademark infringement), a court may award unjust enrichment caused by the misuse. Unjust enrichment refers to the benefit or gain received by the defendant as a result of the misuse. Unjust enrichment can be measured in several ways depending on relevant facts and economic principles.

One measure of unjust enrichment is the defendant’s profits that were caused by the misuse of intellectual property. This may be an appropriate measure in cases where the defendant’s profits, or a portion thereof, are attributable to the misuse. Under this measure of unjust enrichment, an issue often disputed is the causal relationship, or lack thereof, between the misuse and the claimed profits.

Another measure of unjust enrichment is the defendant’s cost savings that were caused by the misuse of intellectual property. This may be an appropriate measure in cases where the misuse enabled the defendant to save or avoid costs. Cost savings or avoided costs measures often involve careful consideration of actual and counterfactual costs.

Another related measure of unjust enrichment is the defendant’s head-start advantage that was caused by the misuse of intellectual property. This may be an appropriate measure in cases where the defendant gained a temporal advantage as a result of the misuse. Identification of the timing of the advantage, and potentially when the advantage ends, can be a fundamental aspect of head-start advantage measures.

Engagement Examples

  • Performed an analysis of unjust enrichment resulting from alleged misappropriation of trade secrets relating to payment transaction processing middleware, including evaluation of the economic benefit of the trade secrets, the contribution of the trade secrets to the middleware, and costs and time associated with development of economic alternatives.
  • Evaluated unjust enrichment to an internet service provider resulting from alleged copyright infringement via file sharing based on an analysis of internet use, internet demand, internet service subscriptions, and costs.
  • Analyzed pricing, design, and other aspects of relevant products to inform on the economic value of the trade secrets at issue in a dispute involving two large semiconductor manufacturing foundries.
  • Evaluated unjust enrichment in litigation involving alleged misappropriation of trade secrets relating to mobile device testing based on consideration of supply agreements, product sales, product costs, and the contribution of the trade secrets to the defendant’s profits.
Reasonable Royalties

Upon a finding of patent infringement, a court shall award damages adequate to compensate for the infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by the infringer. A reasonable royalty can be determined through an analysis of what a willing licensor and a willing licensee would have bargained for during an arm’s-length, hypothetical negotiation occurring on the eve of infringement. Several approaches, along with the Georgia-Pacific factors, can provide guidance.

The market approach often utilizes comparable license agreements or similar transactions to inform upon a reasonable royalty. Economic and technological differences between the comparable agreement and the hypothetical negotiation can often be quantified by way of economic, financial, or statistical methods. Such differences can include products, technologies, suppliers, customers, time periods, and competitive environments.

The income approach considers financial benefits derived by the infringer as a result of using the patented technology. These benefits can include higher prices, increased sales quantities, or reduced costs.

The cost approach can evaluate the costs of implementing a viable non-infringing alternative that provides that is reasonably available and provides similar benefits to the patented technology.

Engagement Examples

  • Calculated reasonable royalties in litigation involving video coding technology used in personal computers and gaming devices, including investigation of standard-essential patents, reasonable and non-discriminatory licensing practices, and the impact of patent licensing pools.
  • In litigation involving the alleged unauthorized use of a consumer electronic patent, quantified economic damages and analyzed the economic aspects of contracts containing a license to the patent-in-suit. Also analyzed economic substitution, marketplace competition, product differentiation, sales, profitability, and other economic considerations relating to a reasonable royalty.
  • Performed an analysis of damages relating to alleged infringement of patented biotechnology by quantifying reasonable royalties based on consideration of relevant licensing agreements, accused sales and profitability, and the unique contribution of the patented technology.
  • Utilized statistical methods to isolate the impact of the asserted patents to the accused product’s price due to the associated performance enhancements. In certain cases, using statistical methods improves the precision of reasonable royalty calculations based on an income approach.
Injunctive Relief

Irreparable harm, public interest, and balance of the equities are factors considered by courts in evaluating whether injunctive relief is appropriate in the context of patent infringement. The issue of irreparable harm examines whether the claimant’s harms are quantifiable and evaluates the causal nexus between the alleged harm and patent infringement. The public interest is evaluated by reviewing benefits and losses realized by the public, including the availability of substitutes, the impact of an injunction on prices, and the importance of patent rights in innovation. The balance of equities weighs the harms faced by the accused party if an injunction is granted versus the harms faced by the claimant if not granted.

Engagement Examples

  • Conducted analysis for a pharmaceutical supplier to help decide whether to seek injunctive relief against drug stockpiling. Defined modeling criteria for measuring the potential economic effects of generic drug stockpiling to a branded pharmaceutical supplier. Analyzed economic effects and determined that the magnitude of these economic effects varies due to multiple factors, including the amount of stockpiled generic product, unconstrained generic demand, generic production capacity, branded and generic pricing strategies, and branded price erosion, among others.
  • Performed detailed economic analysis in 48 hours to assist our client in response to an application for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that would prohibit the client from launching a new sporting goods product line that allegedly infringed patents held by a competitor. Evaluated marketplace dynamics, pricing, production costs, production processes, marketing strategies, market segmentation, quantification of potential damages, and potential impacts on business opportunities and reputation.
  • Provided expert analysis on behalf of the defendants in a global patent litigation case involving an innovative heart valve repair treatment. Opined that harm was not irreparable, and that the balance of equities and the public interest did not favor an injunction. Analysis was instrumental in U.S. Judge’s decision to deny Plaintiffs’ motions for a TRO and a preliminary injunction.

Latest Insights

Explore Other Services

Antitrust & Competition

Courts and regulatory authorities around the world rely on our economic analysis to formulate and apply competition law.

Asset Tracing and Recovery

The ability to locate assets, establish clear lines of ownership, identify encumbrances, and evaluate recovery strategies is a critical element in many disputes and the resultant litigation cases.   There has long been tension between increasing global transparency around beneficial ownership, driven by recent legislation targeting financial crime and tax evasion, and the continued use […]

Auctions & Bargaining

From airwave spectrum rights to mineral rights and more, markets today depend on auctions, and potential bidders in these high-stakes auctions rely on sophisticated analysis and expert guidance to be successful.

Brokerage Compliance and Disputes

Secretariat provides expert broker-dealer advisory, regulatory compliance consulting, and litigation support, helping financial institutions navigate SEC, FINRA, DOJ, and other regulatory challenges.

Business Intelligence

Secretariat delivers actionable business intelligence, combining advanced research tools with our extensive global network of trusted local sources. Our expertise enables clients to uncover critical insights, mitigate risk, and make informed decisions in high-stakes situations. Our mission is to deliver strategic business intelligence with integrity, empowering clients to navigate complex challenges through trusted insights, rigorous […]

Class Actions

The ability to gather and distill the volumes of data often underlying a class action – and present a clear and meaningful analysis to courts, regulators, and others – is fundamental to Secretariat’s expertise.

Construction Delay

When projects are delayed, owners, contractors, designers, insurers, governmental agencies, and law firms across the globe trust Secretariat’s leading experts to provide their independent and rigorous analysis to help avoid, pursue, or defend costly disputes. Secretariat stands apart in how we articulate clear and concise opinions for even the most complex analyses.

Construction Fraud

Secretariat conducts in-depth investigations into fraud and misconduct in large-scale construction projects, leveraging forensic accounting, data analytics, and industry expertise to help clients mitigate risk, recover costs, and enhance compliance.

Construction Quantum

Assessing the cost impacts and complex challenges of major international construction and engineering projects requires unique experience and knowledge. No team excels in this arena like Secretariat.

Damages & Valuations

With proven skills in complex cases and exceptional strength in analytics, Secretariat experts provided extensive guidance on domestic and international matters involving commercial damages and disputes.

Data Analytics & Strategy

Secretariat’s experts and advisors address complex data challenges involved in disputes, investigations, and litigation.

Digital Forensics & eDiscovery

Our industry-leading expertise in digital forensics and eDiscovery delivers thorough analysis and seamless solutions for data-intensive legal and investigative needs.

Engineering Sciences

Across disciplines, regions, and industries, Secretariat’s highly-credentialed, collaborative engineering and scientific experts apply technical excellence and creativity to meet today’s most complex challenges.

Forensic Accounting

Secretariat’s highly experienced forensic accounting experts uncover financial misconduct and help resolve disputes with the investigative techniques necessary to analyze complex financial data, trace assets, and provide comprehensive reports and expert testimony, ensuring swift action with effective communication.

Independent Compliance Monitoring

Secretariat provides expert Independent Compliance Monitoring and Monitorship Consulting, offering strategic support for DOJ and SEC Monitorships, Deferred Prosecution Agreements and compliance program enhancements.

Intellectual Property

Secretariat’s experts have an unparalleled depth of experience providing analysis, opinions, and testimony in high-stakes patent litigation, proceedings at the International Trade Commission, and strategic advisory engagements. Our expertise in patents extends beyond litigation and disputes, to advising clients on licensing negotiations, valuation, patent monetization strategies, product forecasting, and launch analyses.

International Arbitration

Continuously ranked at the top of Global Arbitration Review’s Expert Witness Firms’ Power Index, Secretariat’s experts have a long history of providing the kind of insightful, objective analysis and highly persuasive testimony trusted in some of the highest value arbitrations across the globe.

International Trade and Sanctions

Secretariat assists multinational corporations and their counsel in conducting internal investigations, forensic analysis, and regulatory compliance reviews to address DOJ, OFAC, and BIS enforcement actions related to international trade and sanctions issues.

Investigations & Disputes

Suspicions or allegations of corporate misdeeds can cause tremendous harm and disruption to any organization. At Secretariat, our decades of experience drilling down to the facts can provide the confidence to know risks can be managed and challenges addressed and overcome.

Labor & Employment

Parties in labor and employment disputes – in cases brought by individuals or as class actions – depend on independent and verifiable economic analyses to support their positions. The experts at Secretariat have decades of experience analyzing claims, valuing damages, and turning large volumes of data into litigation support that clients and courts can readily understand and trust.

Mechanical Engineering

Courts and regulatory authorities around the world rely on our economic analysis to formulate and apply competition law.

Mergers & Acquisitions

M&A transactions are among the most complex business activities from every perspective: financial, competitive, regulatory, and beyond. The bigger the parties, the more exponentially complex the transactions. From providing objective valuations and economic clarity to helping clients navigate regulatory investigations, Secretariat has a long history of advising both buyers and sellers in many industries in the U.S. and across the globe in some of the largest and most complex M&A transactions.

Metallurgy & Materials Science

Metals, plastics, composites, and other engineering materials shape the modern-day world in which we live. From the steel used to build awe-inspiring skyscrapers and concrete supporting major infrastructure works, down to the elements that enable consumer electronics and nanotechnologies, we rely on materials in all ways big and small. While these materials shape the world […]

Regulatory & Public Policy

From telecommunications to energy issues, Secretariat’s economists and experts regularly advise companies and individuals navigating the world of complex regulations, enforcement, and rule-making.

Risk Advisory

Secretariat helps multinational companies manage risks and compliance challenges to protect their reputations, prevent disruptions to their operations and business relationships, and avoid regulatory scrutiny.

Securities & Finance

At Secretariat, our adept Securities and Finance professionals craft pragmatic strategies and rigorous financial and economic analyses tailored for law firms, financial institutions, corporations, and government agencies enmeshed in consequential legal battles.

test

Talk to Our Insightful Experts