News | June 16, 2026
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
Mr. Nedinsky has more than two decades of experience in the construction industry and specializes in providing independent expert advice on construction projects in scheduling/programming (delay and disruption), and productivity/inefficiency.
Washington, DC
Tony Nedinsky has more than two decades of experience in the construction industry and specializes in providing independent expert advice on construction projects in scheduling/programming (delay and disruption), and productivity/inefficiency.
Mr. Nedinsky’s professional experience includes working with owners, contractors, and stakeholders and consulting on matters including project controls, scheduling/programming, contract disputes, and claims. He has been appointed as an independent expert on scheduling/programming and project delay on construction disputes in arbitration, litigation, and mediation. Mr. Nedinsky has extensive expertise in critical path method (CPM) scheduling/programming, concentrating on claims and disputes arising from project delays. His experience includes analyses related to delay, disruption, productivity, time impacts, acceleration, and other project management and construction issues.
Before his consulting and expert witness experience, Mr. Nedinsky worked with a large, heavy civil contractor in a construction management role.
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
What Companies Should Be Watching in Securities Enforcement for the Remainder of 2026
Companies face a shifting securities enforcement landscape in H2 2026, where AI, digital assets, prediction markets, and parallel investigations create new risks even as financial reporting and controls remain core priorities driving more targeted, tech-focused, and multi-agency scrutiny.
Algorithmic Pricing, Antitrust Risk, and the Role of Economic Analysis
Recent DOJ settlements and new California and New York legislation are clarifying antitrust risks around algorithmic pricing. This article examines key enforcement themes, high-risk forms of data sharing and information exchange, and the role of economic analysis in assessing algorithm design, adoption, competitive effects, and compliance risk.