News | March 10, 2026
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Dr. Harne is a leading expert in the field of vibration and acoustics. He has over a decade of experience investigating matters related to shock, vibration, ultrasound, and noise, including the audibility of acoustic communication, signals, and warnings. Dr. Harne has also led myriad efforts to investigate the functioning and failure of mechanical systems, ranging from consumer products and electronics, household HVAC and septic, power generation and industrial equipment, medical devices, power tools and construction hardware, vehicular components, and much more.
Dr. Harne’s expertise is in mechanical engineering, with emphasis in the fields of vibration, acoustics, mechanical design, and mechanical aspects of construction (MEP). As a licensed Professional Engineer and lifetime Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Dr. Harne is a trusted expert to solve complex problems pertaining to the design, functioning, and failure of diverse mechanical systems.
He also investigates HVAC- and septic/wastewater-related defects and reported occupational injuries. To this end, Dr. Harne is OSHA 30- and OSHA 510-certified, has earned credentials from the National Onsite Wastewater Recycling Association (NOWRA) for the design of septic and wastewater treatment systems, and is a standing member of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).
Examples of Dr. Harne’s investigations include:
Before joining Secretariat, Dr. Harne held a variety of roles that contribute to the breadth with which he approaches his investigations. From 2015 to 2023, Dr. Harne was a professor of mechanical engineering and acoustics at The Ohio State University and then at The Pennsylvania State University. At OSU and Penn State, he led cutting-edge research in vibration and acoustics, supported by both industrial partners and national funding agencies, published in the most respectful academic journals in the world, including Nature and Nature Communications, and was popularly regarded for his ability to teach complex topics in mechanical engineering and acoustics in accessible ways for diverse audiences.
In 2018, Dr. Harne co-founded a startup that successfully commercialized intellectual property that he patented related to shock and vibration damping materials. In the process, he collaborated with product teams at numerous multi-national companies for development efforts in markets ranging from acoustical building products, consumer goods and appliances, automotive components, power tools, oil and gas, power generation equipment, HVAC equipment, and medical devices, to name a few. Dr. Harne was named by The Top 100 Magazine as one of the top 100 entrepreneurs and innovators of 2025.
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Political, Economic, and Financial Crime Risk Trends in Latin America
Enforcement and regulatory conditions observed during 2025 continue to influence cross border risk exposure across Latin America in 2026. These conditions are particularly relevant for financial institutions, illicit supply chains, and organized criminal activity, and continue to shape how corporate governance, regulatory exposure, and private sector risk are evaluated.
The Economics of Remedies to Restore Competition in Epic v. Google
Epic Games’ (“Epic”) suit against Google over the Google Play Store (GPS) and its payment system, Google Play Billing (GPB), continues to capture attention as one of the most closely watched recent U.S. antitrust battles. Now, however, the focus of the case has shifted from Epic’s jury win and Judge Donato’s injunction remedies to the parties’ settlement and proposed remedy changes. The parties’ proposal has engendered judicial skepticism, amici involvement, opinions from Court-appointed experts, and economic scrutiny that may derail the parties’ proposed deal.