Dr. Pablo Salinas has nearly a decade of experience building economic models for antitrust litigation in the United States, as well as international experience advising on a merger in Chile.
Washington, DC
Dr. Salinas builds economic models for antitrust analysis of high-tech and dynamic industries such as network switches, internet domains, interest rates, automobile parts, capacitors, rail transportation, ocean shipping, aircraft manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals. Dr. Salinas develops strategies for modeling and hypothesis testing used in antitrust litigation and is an expert in methods for the analysis of economic damages from collusion.
For his dissertation Dr. Salinas proposed a structural economic model of terrorist attack risk and severity.
Dr. Salinas has also served as a lecturer in game theory and statistics for undergraduate students and as the graduate teaching assistant for the PhD econometrics sequence at the University of Maryland.
Marking 135 Years of the Sherman Antitrust Act
Today, Secretariat marks the 135th anniversary of the Sherman Antitrust Act, enacted by the 51st U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison on July 2, 1890. The Act was the first comprehensive federal legislation to promote competition, criminalize monopolistic behavior, and empower courts to uphold economic efficiency as a public good.
Navigating ECCTA: A Guide for Organizations
Ben Boorer, writing for Enterprise Times, discusses the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA), which comes into force on 1st September 2025. ECCTA will reshape the UK’s compliance landscape by, amongst other things, holding organisations accountable for fraud committed by employees, agents, and subsidiaries.
Google Damages Ruling Offers Lessons for Testifying Experts
In an article for Law360, Director Adam Rhoten explores the implications and significance of the recent en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision in EcoFactor Inc. v. Google LLC, a significant ruling that marks a shift toward stricter judicial scrutiny of expert testimony in patent cases.