News | March 10, 2026
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Mr. Van Benschoten is a construction claims professional. He has broad experience as a consultant in scheduling and forensic delay analysis, quantum development and defense, productivity and disruption analysis, advisory services, and dispute resolution.
Philadelphia
Kurt Van Benschoten is a construction claims professional with significant consulting experience in scheduling and forensic delay analysis, quantum development and defense, productivity and disruption analysis, advisory services, and dispute resolution.
Mr. Van Benschoten assists owners, contractors, and designers in delivering capital projects and provides expert analysis and advisory services. He resolves disputes related to large and complex construction projects and has consulted clients on projects throughout the United States and Canada. He helps clients on issues on building construction, infrastructure, transportation, oil & gas, pipeline, medical facilities, and industrial power and petrochemical plants.
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Political, Economic, and Financial Crime Risk Trends in Latin America
Enforcement and regulatory conditions observed during 2025 continue to influence cross border risk exposure across Latin America in 2026. These conditions are particularly relevant for financial institutions, illicit supply chains, and organized criminal activity, and continue to shape how corporate governance, regulatory exposure, and private sector risk are evaluated.
The Economics of Remedies to Restore Competition in Epic v. Google
Epic Games’ (“Epic”) suit against Google over the Google Play Store (GPS) and its payment system, Google Play Billing (GPB), continues to capture attention as one of the most closely watched recent U.S. antitrust battles. Now, however, the focus of the case has shifted from Epic’s jury win and Judge Donato’s injunction remedies to the parties’ settlement and proposed remedy changes. The parties’ proposal has engendered judicial skepticism, amici involvement, opinions from Court-appointed experts, and economic scrutiny that may derail the parties’ proposed deal.