News | June 16, 2026
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
Mr. Maxson provides analysis to support experts for a wide variety of disputes, valuations, and forensic accounting matters, specializing in intellectual property disputes.
Mr. Maxson has five years of professional experience consulting for various litigation and non-litigation related matters. He has managed teams to support testifying expert witnesses in preparing expert reports and providing testimony in multiple trials in federal courts and in arbitrations. He has extensive experience in intellectual property disputes and providing financial analysis and complex modeling to support clients in calculating damages. He has assessed lost profits and reasonable royalties across multiple industries including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, software, consumer products, financial services, and manufacturing.
Additionally, Mr. Maxson has provided consulting services in forensic accounting investigations, regulatory matters, and general accounting matters. He has assisted in conducting complex investigations related to accounting irregularities and whistleblower allegations on behalf of companies, shareholders, and boards.
Mr. Maxson is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) licensed in Illinois.
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
What Companies Should Be Watching in Securities Enforcement for the Remainder of 2026
Companies face a shifting securities enforcement landscape in H2 2026, where AI, digital assets, prediction markets, and parallel investigations create new risks even as financial reporting and controls remain core priorities driving more targeted, tech-focused, and multi-agency scrutiny.
Algorithmic Pricing, Antitrust Risk, and the Role of Economic Analysis
Recent DOJ settlements and new California and New York legislation are clarifying antitrust risks around algorithmic pricing. This article examines key enforcement themes, high-risk forms of data sharing and information exchange, and the role of economic analysis in assessing algorithm design, adoption, competitive effects, and compliance risk.