Jacob Miller

Manager

​​Mr. Miller specializes in developing analyses and quantifying damages related to intellectual property disputes, antitrust litigation, and breach of contract matters. He is skilled in analyzing datasets related to financial and sales data and has experience across the technology, pharmaceutical, and consumer products industries.​

​​​Mr. Miller specializes in developing analyses and quantifying damages related to intellectual property disputes, antitrust litigation, and breach of contract matters. He is skilled in analyzing datasets related to financial and sales data and has experience across the technology, pharmaceutical, and consumer products industries. He is also experienced in coordinating requests related to trial preparation, deposition preparation, and pre-litigation matters with counsel and end-clients.

​Examples of Mr. Miller’s work include the following projects:

  • ​Analysis of anti-competitive behaviors under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act: Analyzed antitrust allegations involving monopolization and tying related to mobile app distribution under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, addressing issues including market definition, market power, tying behavior, and competitive effects; evaluated pro-competitive justifications and anti-competitive effects of tying on market participants generally and plaintiffs specifically; determined a but-for commission; and analyzed overcharge damages based on the difference between actual commission and but-for commission. 
  • Analysis of anti-competitive behaviors related to most favored nations policies: Analyzed antitrust allegations involving a most favored nations policy, addressing issues such as market definition, market power, harm to class members, common evidence, and damages. Evaluated procompetitive justifications and anticompetitive effects of alleged misconduct on market participants.
  • Analysis of trademark infringement: Evaluated damages related to alleged infringement of a trademark in the sports technology
    industry. Analyses included evaluating company financials, the importance of the mark, and the trademark holder’s value before alleged infringement.
  • Analyses of economic harm resulting from alleged patent infringement: Evaluated marketplace dynamics, licensing policies, competitive relationships, sales and profitability, and the economic contributions of the patented technology to determine the quantification of lost profits and a reasonable royalty for farming equipment, telecommunications technology, and sports technology, among others.

​​​

Related Insights

Talk to Our Insightful Experts