News | March 10, 2026
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Mr. Saunders specialises in project planning and programming, specifically the forensic analysis of delay to projects.
Gerard Saunders specialises in project planning and programming, specifically the forensic analysis of delay to projects. He has more than 18 years of experience in the water, mining, oil & gas, infrastructure, and building industries working in the project office and site environments in Australia, Southeast Asia, the United Kingdom, and Southern Africa.
Mr. Saunders has employed critical path methods of analyses to identify the incidence, extent and causes of critical delay for engineering and construction projects, including buildings, mining, oil and gas, transport, marine, and utility projects. He has supported testifying experts in court and arbitral hearings and provided written evidence for adjudication, arbitration, and the Supreme Court of Queensland.
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Political, Economic, and Financial Crime Risk Trends in Latin America
Enforcement and regulatory conditions observed during 2025 continue to influence cross border risk exposure across Latin America in 2026. These conditions are particularly relevant for financial institutions, illicit supply chains, and organized criminal activity, and continue to shape how corporate governance, regulatory exposure, and private sector risk are evaluated.
The Economics of Remedies to Restore Competition in Epic v. Google
Epic Games’ (“Epic”) suit against Google over the Google Play Store (GPS) and its payment system, Google Play Billing (GPB), continues to capture attention as one of the most closely watched recent U.S. antitrust battles. Now, however, the focus of the case has shifted from Epic’s jury win and Judge Donato’s injunction remedies to the parties’ settlement and proposed remedy changes. The parties’ proposal has engendered judicial skepticism, amici involvement, opinions from Court-appointed experts, and economic scrutiny that may derail the parties’ proposed deal.