Mr. Brindisi specializes in construction project management, claims management, and dispute resolution. He has consulted on complex multi-million dollar construction projects throughout the world on budget control, construction planning/scheduling, and project delay & damages. In addition, he has been appointed as an independent expert on scheduling and project delays for construction disputes in formal contract negotiations.
Philadelphia
Chris Brindisi specializes in construction project management, claims management, and dispute resolution. He has consulted on complex multi-million dollar construction projects throughout the world on budget control, construction planning/scheduling, and project delay and damages. In addition, he has been appointed as an independent expert on scheduling and project delays for construction disputes in formal contract negotiations.
Mr. Brindisi has expertise in CPM scheduling and delay analysis, disruption analysis, issue analysis, and litigation support, and various cost analyses.
He has provided services across numerous projects, including oil refineries, airports, stadiums, power plants, infrastructure works, and government facilities. His experience includes reviewing and analyzing contract and tender information, preparing as-planned and as-built schedules, and determining project time impacts and acceleration. Mr. Brindisi has implemented various productivity analyses, and resolved other project management and dispute–related issues.
Mr. Brindisi has also performed cost-related analyses for construction and non-construction projects.
Who’s Who Legal recognizes Mr. Brindisi as a Global Leader: Construction Expert Witnesses – Future Leaders 2022:
“Chris is a top testifying expert and is simply excellent”
“He quickly understands complex technical issues”
“He is focused, constructive and inspires confidence”
Why Funder Forecasts Don’t Belong in Royalty Analysis
This article originally appeared on Law360 on June 24, 2025. In a recent article published by Law360, Managing Director Rick Eichmann explores the economic reasoning behind the U.S. District Court’s decision in Haptic Inc. v. Apple Inc. and why prelitigation funding forecasts should not be conflated with royalty analyses in patent litigation. Eichmann explains how models developed for […]
SFO’s ‘Cast-Iron Guarantee’ on Self-Reporting Comes With Fine Print
Ben Boorer, writing for Corporate Compliance Insights, examines the UK Serious Fraud Office’s clearest commitment yet to corporate self-reporting, offering a “cast-iron guarantee” of DPA negotiations for companies that self-report and cooperate. The guidance sets out defined timelines intended to bring greater predictability, but uncertainties remain around how much investigation is expected before reporting, what […]
Strengthening Export Control Compliance: Advanced Strategies for Third-Party Audits
This article first appeared on Law360 on July 7, 2025. In a recent Law360 article, Michael H. Huneke of Hughes Hubbard & Reed and John Rademacher and Abby Williams of Secretariat explore advanced strategies for strengthening export control compliance through improved third-party audits. U.S. technologies continue to be diverted to foreign adversaries, often through networks of resellers […]