Article | June 12, 2025
In this GIR article, Stephen Millington and Dominique Dondelinger examine the growing fraud risks facing the Gulf region amid rapid economic expansion and transformative Vision 2030 strategies.
March 5, 2025
By Hanna Gorelick & Howard Rosenkrantz
During his 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump made tariffs a cornerstone of his foreign and domestic policy.[1] With new 25% tariffs now imposed on Mexico and Canada, along with an additional 10% tariff on imports from China, the threat of additional tariffs against these, and other countries and trading partners, has not subsided.[2] In addition to these measures, President Trump has announced a policy to charge reciprocal tariffs, meaning to tax foreign goods at the same rate other nations apply to American products.[3]
Due to the large volume of goods being imported into the United States, only a small portion can be inspected by Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officials. The U.S. customs system relies on importers to accurately report the type, value, and country of origin for the merchandise brought into the country.[4] The added cost of doing business due to tariffs may incline companies to circumvent all or a portion of the increased import duty by falsifying the value, type, and / or country of origin when reporting to the government. These misstatements could give rise to violations of the False Claims Act (FCA).
§3729(a)(1)(G)[5] of the FCA, known as the reverse false claim, imposes liability on those who avoid paying money to the government. This section is commonly applied to customs violations when goods are undervalued, misclassified, or undeclared.[6] The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and CBP have traditionally brought enforcement actions for avoidance of duty obligations. During a recent False Claims and Qui Tam Enforcement conference, DOJ Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston emphasized that the FCA is a tool for customs duty evasion.[7] [8] Many in attendance at this conference were plaintiffs’ attorneys, indicating that the DOJ is encouraging them to pursue FCA claims, even if the government declines to intervene.
The DOJ has been active in this area even before President Trump’s election and has pursued several notable cases.
Many other recent cases involved falsification of invoices, misclassifying goods, undervaluing imports, and splitting imports into multiple packages – a process known as structuring – to pay lower customs duties.
With Michael Granston’s remarks in conjunction with the Trump administration indicating it will use the FCA aggressively, it is likely that the government will pursue customs duty violation under the FCA.
Given the likely increase in enforcement, companies should be proactive in monitoring any potential wrongdoing within their organizations. The following should be key areas of focus:
The possibility of circumventing import duties will likely increase as tariffs are imposed in various sectors of the economy, causing companies to face more pressure to minimize the added costs of doing business. Therefore, proactive measures should be taken to minimize the potential problems. Strengthening internal policies and controls, and conducting ongoing monitoring of these processes, are essential.
[1] Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Imposes Tariffs on Imports from Canada, Mexico and China – The White House
[2] https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-tariffs-canada-mexico-china-stock-market-today-03-04-2025
[3] https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-announces-fair-and-reciprocal-plan-on-trade/
[4] https://www.cbp.gov/travel/international-visitors/know-before-you-visit/customs-duty-information
[5] Other sections on the FCA impose liability on those who have submitted false claims or made a false record or statement to receive payment from the Government.
[6] https://www.justice.gov/d9/civil/legacy/2011/04/22/C-FRAUDS_FCA_Primer
[7] Agenda | False Claims and Qui Tam Enforcement
[8] Daniel Wilson, “DOJ Official Flags ‘Aggressive’ FCA Approach Under Trump,” Law360, February 20, 2025.
[9] https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/us-attorney-lapointe-announces-76-million-settlement-civil-false-claims-act-lawsuit
[10] https://www.justice.gov/usao-edwi/pr/two-brookfield-wisconsin-based-companies-and-their-owners-pay-over-10-million-resolve
[11] https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/king-kong-tools-settles-claims-customs-fraud-19-million#:~:text=By%20falsely%20describing%20the%20tools,China%20Pacificarbide%2C%20Inc.
In this GIR article, Stephen Millington and Dominique Dondelinger examine the growing fraud risks facing the Gulf region amid rapid economic expansion and transformative Vision 2030 strategies.
Public Cos. Must Heed Disclosure Risks Amid Trade Chaos
Ongoing uncertainties caused by the trade war and President Donald Trump’s evolving stance on tariffs and trade restrictions, including sanctions and export controls, have exponentially escalated financial reporting pressures on public companies. In this article, we discuss the key financial reporting and disclosure risks, as well as takeaways, for public companies as they navigate significant market instability in international trade.
Tanner Weil and Marc Pichon will present their paper, “Leveraging Business Intelligence Platforms for Data Analytics in Forensic Schedule Analysis & Quantification of Damages for Construction Projects” at the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) 2025 Conference & Expo, taking place June 15-17 in Anaheim, California.