News | March 10, 2026
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
March 26, 2025
We’re excited to announce the launch of our latest Artificial Intelligence (AI) global report in collaboration with ACEDS, providing a critical snapshot of industry sentiment, adoption trends, and the evolving role of AI in legal practice.
AI is rapidly reshaping legal practice, with Generative AI (GenAI) now a dominant force in the industry. The Secretariat and ACEDS 2025 Artificial Intelligence Report, now in its third year, highlights the latest trends in AI adoption, industry sentiment, and the challenges professionals face in integrating AI into their legal practice and workflows.
This year’s results reflect significant shifts, including:
As AI continues to evolve rapidly, organizations must make critical decisions on adoption, strategy, and implementation. Our global report provides key insights to help you navigate these changes swiftly and effectively.
Reach out to Richard Finkelman if you would like to discuss any of the issues raised in this report or if you would be interested in joining our Working Group: Code & Counsel: Women in Legal & AI.
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Political, Economic, and Financial Crime Risk Trends in Latin America
Enforcement and regulatory conditions observed during 2025 continue to influence cross border risk exposure across Latin America in 2026. These conditions are particularly relevant for financial institutions, illicit supply chains, and organized criminal activity, and continue to shape how corporate governance, regulatory exposure, and private sector risk are evaluated.
The Economics of Remedies to Restore Competition in Epic v. Google
Epic Games’ (“Epic”) suit against Google over the Google Play Store (GPS) and its payment system, Google Play Billing (GPB), continues to capture attention as one of the most closely watched recent U.S. antitrust battles. Now, however, the focus of the case has shifted from Epic’s jury win and Judge Donato’s injunction remedies to the parties’ settlement and proposed remedy changes. The parties’ proposal has engendered judicial skepticism, amici involvement, opinions from Court-appointed experts, and economic scrutiny that may derail the parties’ proposed deal.