News | March 10, 2026
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
January 6, 2026
Amanda Rasmussen and Kristine Kwok examine the gradual expansion of reciprocal enforcement regimes and the growing recognition of PRC judgments and arbitral awards in major jurisdictions, highlighting increasingly favorable conditions for cross-border recovery. Recent PRC–Hong Kong legal developments, including the China–Hong Kong Reciprocal Enforcement Ordinance effective from January 2024, along with enforcement cases in the US, UK, Canada, Australia and Singapore reflect a more predictable landscape for recognition of PRC court judgments and arbitral awards overseas.
The article describes publicly available resources for asset tracing especially to identify directly held and unencumbered assets. It emphasizes that early asset tracing can help identify dissipation or fraudulent conveyance, establish a baseline for comparison over time, and support enforcement planning from the outset. It concludes that engaging advisors with experience in international arbitration, cross-border litigation, forensic accounting and investigations can enhance the likelihood of successful enforcement.
First Things First: Why Technical Competence Must Precede AI Literacy for Lawyers
We are pleased to support the launch of a new white paper from Code & Counsel, sponsored by Secretariat and ACEDS.
Political, Economic, and Financial Crime Risk Trends in Latin America
Enforcement and regulatory conditions observed during 2025 continue to influence cross border risk exposure across Latin America in 2026. These conditions are particularly relevant for financial institutions, illicit supply chains, and organized criminal activity, and continue to shape how corporate governance, regulatory exposure, and private sector risk are evaluated.
The Economics of Remedies to Restore Competition in Epic v. Google
Epic Games’ (“Epic”) suit against Google over the Google Play Store (GPS) and its payment system, Google Play Billing (GPB), continues to capture attention as one of the most closely watched recent U.S. antitrust battles. Now, however, the focus of the case has shifted from Epic’s jury win and Judge Donato’s injunction remedies to the parties’ settlement and proposed remedy changes. The parties’ proposal has engendered judicial skepticism, amici involvement, opinions from Court-appointed experts, and economic scrutiny that may derail the parties’ proposed deal.