News | June 16, 2026
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
February 29, 2024
The American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section has published the article “Difference-in-Differences Renaissance and Implications for Antitrust Economic Analyses” by Director Jéssica Dutra. Recent advancements in econometrics have shown that the classic formulation of a difference-in-differences (DiD) – Two-way Fixed Effects – although fairly intuitive, may yield a miscalculated magnitude of the policy effect size, potentially going as far as providing an estimate in the opposite direction of the actual effect. In her article, Jéssica shows that by choosing the appropriate specification under the new developments of DiD, antitrust experts can ensure that antitrust enforcement remains grounded in sound economic principles and evidence-based reasoning.
Read the article here (ABA membership required):
New offering bridges the gap between technology expectations and real-world performance, helping clients manage disputes, remediation efforts, and emerging technologies.
What Companies Should Be Watching in Securities Enforcement for the Remainder of 2026
Companies face a shifting securities enforcement landscape in H2 2026, where AI, digital assets, prediction markets, and parallel investigations create new risks even as financial reporting and controls remain core priorities driving more targeted, tech-focused, and multi-agency scrutiny.
Algorithmic Pricing, Antitrust Risk, and the Role of Economic Analysis
Recent DOJ settlements and new California and New York legislation are clarifying antitrust risks around algorithmic pricing. This article examines key enforcement themes, high-risk forms of data sharing and information exchange, and the role of economic analysis in assessing algorithm design, adoption, competitive effects, and compliance risk.