This project was completed by Intensity. Intensity joined Secretariat on February 1, 2023.
A manufacturer of aircraft systems asserted claims of patent infringement and remedies of lost profits, reasonable royalties, and irreparable harm against a competitor. The claimed technology at issue related to aircraft interior systems. The patent holder alleged that the competitor improperly earned profit and market share through the alleged infringement and irreparably damaged the patent holder’s ability to compete in the marketplace.
Intensity evaluated the damages set forth by the patent holder and found a number of factors that led to the estimate being inappropriately high. Our work included evaluation of the patented feature’s value as a differentiator in contract awards, analysis of the relative contribution of the patented feature to sales and profits, and determination of a realistic upper bound on lost profits and reasonable royalty damages stemming from alleged patent infringement.
As part of its analysis, Intensity evaluated recent contract awards by the major aircraft manufacturers and airlines and determined that other factors besides the patented feature were the primary differentiators in contract awards. Intensity also evaluated the role of non-infringing alternatives along with the relative cost to design and implement the alternatives and their impact on demand, and used multiple approaches to calculate an upper bound on reasonable royalties for the patents-in-suit that was far less than determined by the patent holder.
Intensity also analyzed the marketplace for aircraft interior systems and determined that there was no irreparable harm, based on lack of demonstrated price erosion, successful competition in winning new contracts by the patent holder, and lack of demonstrated damage to the patent holder’s corporate image.
Secretariat Experts Featured on 2 Guys, a Girl, and F1 Podcast
Shalabh Gupta, Amran Nawaz, and Daniel Nazareth joined the 2 Guys, A Girl, and F1 podcast to discuss their article “Demystifying Andretti’s Failed F1 Application” and share valuable insights on the F1 business landscape, Andretti’s application, and anti-dilution fees. The experts also discuss the motivations behind GM Cadillac’s successful F1 application and its broader impacts on the sport.
Game (Almost) Over: A Damages Expert’s Perspective on Income Losses in Sport
This article dives into the ever-growing area of personal injury damages in sports and the economic theory behind it. We discuss current and historical cases from the United Kingdom, United States, Canada and the Court of Arbitration for Sport, their applicable judgements, and how a damages expert’s evidence (or lack thereof) can impact the monetary damages an athlete may be awarded.
Secretariat Promotes 64 Professionals Across the Firm
We are proud to highlight these promotions, which exemplify the wealth of experience offered by our global professionals and span across 18 offices: Atlanta, Boston, Brisbane, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Dubai, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Mumbai, Munich, New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Toronto, and Washington, DC.