Aircraft Systems Patent Infringement
This project was completed by Intensity. Intensity joined Secretariat on February 1, 2023.
Background
A manufacturer of aircraft systems asserted claims of patent infringement and remedies of lost profits, reasonable royalties, and irreparable harm against a competitor. The claimed technology at issue related to aircraft interior systems. The patent holder alleged that the competitor improperly earned profit and market share through the alleged infringement and irreparably damaged the patent holder’s ability to compete in the marketplace.
Our Analysis
Intensity evaluated the damages set forth by the patent holder and found a number of factors that led to the estimate being inappropriately high. Our work included evaluation of the patented feature’s value as a differentiator in contract awards, analysis of the relative contribution of the patented feature to sales and profits, and determination of a realistic upper bound on lost profits and reasonable royalty damages stemming from alleged patent infringement.
As part of its analysis, Intensity evaluated recent contract awards by the major aircraft manufacturers and airlines and determined that other factors besides the patented feature were the primary differentiators in contract awards. Intensity also evaluated the role of non-infringing alternatives along with the relative cost to design and implement the alternatives and their impact on demand, and used multiple approaches to calculate an upper bound on reasonable royalties for the patents-in-suit that was far less than determined by the patent holder.
Intensity also analyzed the marketplace for aircraft interior systems and determined that there was no irreparable harm, based on lack of demonstrated price erosion, successful competition in winning new contracts by the patent holder, and lack of demonstrated damage to the patent holder’s corporate image.
Latest Insights
Article | July 3, 2025
Taking The Right Approach in Asset Searching and Recovery in 2025
The tension among regulators between the push for increased transparency and the need to protect individual privacy is always apparent in asset searching exercises. This tension is a global phenomenon, central to the ongoing debate surrounding registering beneficial ownership information.
News | July 2, 2025
Marking 135 Years of the Sherman Antitrust Act
Today, Secretariat marks the 135th anniversary of the Sherman Antitrust Act, enacted by the 51st U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Benjamin Harrison on July 2, 1890. The Act was the first comprehensive federal legislation to promote competition, criminalize monopolistic behavior, and empower courts to uphold economic efficiency as a public good.
News | June 26, 2025
Highlights and Takeaways from CBV CONNECT 2025
At the CBV CONNECT 2025 Conference in Toronto, we had the privilege of presenting multiple panels, engaging with fellow business valuation professionals, and exploring the latest developments shaping the future of the industry.
We’ve compiled key takeaways from our time at CONNECT 2025 below, highlighting critical insights from our speaking engagements and the emerging trends we’re watching in the world of business valuation.
See All Insights
Talk to Our Insightful Experts