Mr. Jain specialises in economic damages and valuation. His primary focus is assessing quantum, financial, economic and valuation issues in contentious and non-contentious matters.
Mrinal Jain specialises in economic damages and valuation. His primary focus is assessing quantum, financial, economic and valuation issues in contentious and non-contentious matters. He is recognized as one of the leading expert witnesses in international arbitration, earning recognition in Who’s Who Legal’s Arbitration 2019, 2020 and 2021 Lists and Thought Leader Arbitration Expert Witness 2021.
His experience includes valuation of businesses and equity shares; valuation of IPRs, including intangibles and non-compete agreements; market and economic analysis; research and study for various purposes including dispute resolution; litigation and arbitration support; family settlement; shareholder negotiation; joint venture (entry or exit); merger; acquisition; restructuring; strategic sale & investments; private equity portfolio evaluation as per IPEVC guidelines; and financial reporting purposes.
Mr. Jain began his career in 2007 at a Big Four accounting firm in New York and brings with him more than 14 years of experience in corporate finance, valuation and quantification of damages, claims or losses, as well as the preparation of independent expert reports and rebuttal reports in dispute cases. Specifically, he has worked on more than 25 matters involving domestic and international arbitrations, bilateral investment treaty (BIT) cases, and litigations.
He is a visiting faculty at several business schools and speaker at various national and international conferences.
Why Funder Forecasts Don’t Belong in Royalty Analysis
This article originally appeared on Law360 on June 24, 2025. In a recent article published by Law360, Managing Director Rick Eichmann explores the economic reasoning behind the U.S. District Court’s decision in Haptic Inc. v. Apple Inc. and why prelitigation funding forecasts should not be conflated with royalty analyses in patent litigation. Eichmann explains how models developed for […]
SFO’s ‘Cast-Iron Guarantee’ on Self-Reporting Comes With Fine Print
Ben Boorer, writing for Corporate Compliance Insights, examines the UK Serious Fraud Office’s clearest commitment yet to corporate self-reporting, offering a “cast-iron guarantee” of DPA negotiations for companies that self-report and cooperate. The guidance sets out defined timelines intended to bring greater predictability, but uncertainties remain around how much investigation is expected before reporting, what […]
Strengthening Export Control Compliance: Advanced Strategies for Third-Party Audits
This article first appeared on Law360 on July 7, 2025. In a recent Law360 article, Michael H. Huneke of Hughes Hubbard & Reed and John Rademacher and Abby Williams of Secretariat explore advanced strategies for strengthening export control compliance through improved third-party audits. U.S. technologies continue to be diverted to foreign adversaries, often through networks of resellers […]